How Can 57,216,589.9 People Be So Dumb?

According to a poll released last week by the American Research Group George W. Bush's approval rating as President has fallen to 19% with 77% of respondents disapproving.

As the New York Times Editorial Board points out on its blog, an approval rating of 19% represents a new low, as well as a precipitous drop from the previous month (34%), and is also considerably below other polls (though most polls do such a decline in Mr. Bush's approval rating).

The Board gives a pretty good rundown on these points and duly notes that the ARG poll warmed up its respondents with a series of questions concerning the state of the economy before asking how they felt about Mr. Bush. (the questions asked are at the bottom of the ARG page)

Yes, but what does this have to do with 57,216,589.9 morons you ask? Based on the CIA Factbook estimate of US population for 2007 that's how many of your fellow Americans currently approve of Mr. Bush.

How can they be so dumb I ask?

Easy, they all voted for him.


A Jacksonian at Dumb Looks Still Free has a whole mess of dirt on the ARG, he sure adds a few more grains of salt to be taken with any ARG data.

Yes We Can, No You Can't...YouTube's Growing Power.

How long did it take you to hear about will.i.am's Yes We Can video? How long after that did you tell a friend about it? If the answer is anything other than not long, you probably live off the grid.

will.i.am's exceptionally high quality video, loaded with celebrities large and small, took the online world by storm earlier this month. Not surprisingly it has spawned a number of knock offs, each enjoyable in its own right, which nonetheless would not exist but for the original.

YouTube and other online video hubs have and are changing the way we communicate, at least the those of us ensconced in the web and its technological possibilities. The visual medium, particularly as video, has long been heralded as a more efficient and effective communication portal. Until very recently it was the exclusive domain of television networks, access was tightly controlled and it was nearly impossible for the average Joe to reach out to his neighbors and fellow citizens. (See The Assult on Reason by Al Gore for a great dissection of the larger issues stemming from the one way nature of the current television dominated communication structure in which the American public is mired.) While you still can't get your message broadcast during the superbowl, or even you on your local cable access channel you can put it on the internet.

Threat Level has a nice blurb on the emerging political uses of YouTube and the power of the visual medium, along with a link to help get you started.

To give you a taste of whats out there, and something to aim for (yes will.i.am set the bar very high) here are "Yes We Can", "No You Can't", and "Bomb Iran?"...








The internet, letting me bring you these great messages. Now if only I had of recorded this message as a video, someone might actually have watched it.

For a Change, Good News About Joe Lieberman

That's correct, news about 'Independent Democrat' and John McCain for President endorser Joe Lieberman worth noting.

Mr. Lieberman's cross-party (hah!) endorsement of Mr. McCain disqualifies him as a superdelegate to the Democratic National Convention.

It's about time Mr. Lieberman had a perk taken away by the Democrats, it has been a long long time since he did anything to help the party, or the nation for that matter.

(via Think Progress)

The Real McCain

Just in case you actually believed that Senator John McCain, now the presumptive Republican Presidential nominee, is a 'maverick' especially when it comes to his support and praise of George W. Bush's misbegotten war in Iraq, VoteVets.org would like a word with you.

(from a Move On email)

TO:	Interested Parties
FROM:	VoteVets.org
RE:	Senator McCain's Real Record on the War in Iraq
DATE:	February 8, 2008

---

Senator John McCain presents himself as a maverick and a critic of the Iraq war. But a close read of his record indicates that his position on the Iraq war has consistently matched President George W. Bush's.

Before The War:

McCain used many of the same arguments as Donald Rumsfeld, Vice President Cheney and President Bush when advocating going to war with Iraq.

• McCain co-sponsored the Use of Force Authorization that gave President George W. Bush the green light—and a blank check—for going to war with Iraq. [SJ Res 46, 10/3/02]

• McCain argued Saddam was "a threat of the first order." Senator McCain said that a policy of containing Iraq to blunt its weapons of mass destruction program is "unsustainable, ineffective, unworkable and dangerous." McCain: "I believe Iraq is a threat of the first order, and only a change of regime will make Iraq a state that does not threaten us and others, and where liberated people assume the rights and responsibilities of freedom." [Speech to the Center for Strategic & International Studies, 2/13/03]

• McCain echoed Bush and Cheney's rationale for going to war. McCain: "It's going to send the message throughout the Middle East that democracy can take hold in the Middle East." [Fox, Hannity & Colmes, 2/21/03]

• McCain echoed Bush and Cheney's talking points that the U.S. would only be in Iraq for a short time. McCain: "It's clear that the end is very much in sight. ... It won't be long...it'll be a fairly short period of time." [ABC, 4/9/03]

• McCain said winning the war would be "easy." "I know that as successful as I believe we will be, and I believe that the success will be fairly easy, we will still lose some American young men or women." [CNN, 9/24/02]

During The War:

Senator McCain praised Donald Rumsfeld as late as May 12, 2004, after the Abu Ghraib scandal.

• Asked if Donald Rumsfeld can continue to be an effective secretary of defense, McCain: "Yes, today I do and I believe he's done a fine job. He's an honorable man." [Hannity and Colmes, 5/12/04]

Senator McCain repeatedly supported President Bush on the Iraq War—voting with him in the Senate, defending his actions and publicly praising his leadership.

• McCain maintains the war was a good idea.

At the 2004 Republican National Convention, McCain, focusing on the war in Iraq, said that while weapons of mass destruction were not found, Saddam once had them and "he would have acquired them again." McCain said the mission in Iraq "gave hope to people long oppressed" and it was "necessary, achievable and noble." McCain: "For his determination to undertake it, and for his unflagging resolve to see it through to a just end, President Bush

Senator McCain: "The war, the invasion was not a mistake. [Meet the Press, 1/6/08]

Asked if the war was a good idea worth the price in blood and treasure, McCain: "It was worth getting rid of Saddam Hussein. He had used weapons of mass destruction, and it's clear that he was hell-bent on acquiring them." [Republican Debate, 1/24/08]

• McCain defended Bush's rationale for war. Asked if he thought the president exaggerated the case for war, McCain said, "I don't think so." [Fox News, 7/31/03]

• McCain has been President Bush's most ardent Senate supporter on Iraq. According to Michael Shank of the Foreign Policy in Focus think tank, McCain was at times Bush's "most solid support in the Senate" on Iraq. [Foreign Policy in Focus, 1/15/08]

• McCain voted against holding Bush accountable for his actions in the war. McCain opposed the creation of an independent commission to investigate the development and use of intelligence leading up to the war in Iraq. [S. Amdt. 1275 to H.R. 2658, Vote # 284, 7/16/03]

• McCain praised Bush's leadership on the war. McCain: "I think the president has led with great clarity and I think he's done a great job leading the country..." [MSNBC, Hardball, 4/23/03]

Senator McCain has constantly moved the goal posts of progress for the war—repeatedly saying it would be over soon.

• January 2003: "But the point is that, one, we will win this conflict. We will win it easily." [MSNBC, 1/22/03]

• March 2003: "I believe that this conflict is still going to be relatively short." [NBC, Meet the Press, 3/30/03]

• June 2004: "The terrorists know that this is a very critical time." [CNN, 6/23/04]

• December 2005: "Overall, I think a year from now, we will have a fair amount of progress [in Iraq] if we stay the course." [The Hill, 12/8/05]

• November 2006: "We're either going to lose this thing or win this thing within the next several months." [NBC, Meet the Press, 11/12/06]

Senator McCain opposed efforts to end the overextension of the military that is having a devastating impact on our troops.

• McCain voted against requiring mandatory minimum downtime between tours of duty for troops serving in Iraq. [S. Amdt.. 2909 to S Amdt. 2011 to HR 1585, Vote 341, 9/19/07; S Amdt. 2012 to S Amdt. 2011 to HR 1585, Vote #241, 7/11/07]

• McCain was one of only 13 senators to vote against adding $430 million for inpatient and outpatient care for veterans. [S Amdt. 3642 to HR 4939, Vote 98, 4/26/06]

• Senator McCain has consistently opposed any plan to withdraw troops from Iraq

• Senator McCain repeatedly voted against a timetable for withdrawing troops from Iraq. [S. Amdt. 3876 to S.Amdt. 3874 to H.R. 2764, Vote #438, 12/18/07; S.Amdt.. 3875 to S.Amdt.. 3874 to H.R. 2764, Vote # 437, 12/18/07; S.Amdt.3164 to H.R. 3222, Vote # 362, 10/3/07; S.Amdt. 2898 to S.Amdt. 2011 to H.R. 1585, Vote #346, 9/21/07; S.Amdt. 2924 to S.Amdt.. 2011 to H.R.1585, Vote #345, 9/21/07; S.Amdt.2 087 to S.Amdt. 2011 to H.R. 1585, Vote #252, 7/18/07; S.Amdt. 643 to H.R. 1591, Vote #116, 3/27/07; S.Amdt. 4320 to S. 2766, Vote #182, 6/22/06; S.Amdt. 4442 to S. 2766, Vote #181, 6/22/06; S.Amdt.. 2519 to S.1042, Vote # 322, 11/15/05]

Senator McCain has consistently demonized Americans who want to find a responsible way to remove troops from Iraq so that we can take the fight to al Qaeda.

• McCain: "I believe to set a date for withdrawal is to set a date for surrender." [Charlotte Observer, 9/16/07]

• McCain called proponents of a congressional resolution opposing the troop surge in Iraq intellectually dishonest. [Associated Press. 2/4/07]

The Future:

Senator McCain now says he sees no end to the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq.

• McCain: "[M]ake it a hundred" years in Iraq and "that would be fine with me." [Derry, New Hampshire Town Hall meeting, 1/3/08]

• McCain on how long troops may remain in Iraq: "A thousand years. A million years. Ten million years. It depends on the arrangement we have with the Iraqi government." [Associated Press, 1/04/08]

Not so much.

If you can't make up your mind...

you can always vote for one of the candidates based on their roster of celebrity and political endorsements.

This is a terrible way to choose who to vote for. Listen to what the candidates have to say for themselves, read up on their policy plans, look at their records and history.

But if you really can't decide and you don't want to take my advice, or just see what happens once you get inside the booth. If you need to know who Scarlett Johansson is voting for, the New York Times can help you scratch that itch.

The Times latest interactive political parser breaks down the endorsement field for the remaining candidates in a fun and creative way. Similar to the manner in which the Times has been deconstructing the debates.

(via Threat Level)

Supercalifragilistic...

Tuesday is coming, tomorrow in fact, and on the eve of what will probably prove to be the most decisive single day in the Presidential primary races Walter Shapiro (at Salon) asks what do we really know about the Democratic candidates?

Mr. Shapiro offers some important questions and qualms he harbors about Ms. Clinton and Mr. Obama and how their Presidencies might shape up. Especially in light of the not so smooth beginnings that the last three elected Democratic Presidents (Kennedy, Carter, Clinton) got off to.

The short version is what to make of Ms. Clinton's experience and how it will shape the manner in which she governs; and what will happen when Mr. Obama is actually faced with adversity.

Summing up Mr. Shapiro's thoughts thus do them no justice though. Please go see for yourself, it won't take long.